Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI versus SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 3, 5, 7 and 14B Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 199 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The applicant is compulsorily retired from execution of the order to maintain the constitutional application. But the service tribunal dismissed the order on appeal. After the mandatory retirement and the decision of the service tribunal to restore the applicant in the service department was not challenged before the Supreme Court, nor did the service tribunal petitioner present the order passed by the High Court and The High Court directed the department to implement the service tribunal order. According to the period in which the applicant was away from the job, the order was enforced to the extent that the applicants were involved, but the salary of the applicant was not paid for the intervention period. According to the directive the name of the respondent authority for payment of salaries was earlier submitted by the service tribunal in the decision of the applicant too. The impression was that the High Court had no jurisdiction to direct the execution of the service tribunal's decision, as the High Court has the authority to extend the order / Be directed to implement / comply with the directive, it was accepted and the department The service was instructed to implement the decision and order of payment of salaries related to the show cause hearing on the petition within a specified period. Department list of supreme court advocates from Guddu lawyer