Find a Lawyer

RAJAB ALIAS RAJOO ALIAS NANG AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 365 of Pakistan Constitution (1973), Article 185 (3) of the abductors' statements were filed by the natural witnesses of the incident, including the complainant, who was not shown to have falsely implicated the accused in the prosecution. No hostility or purpose has been achieved for The evidence was true and the record of superficial conviction did not show that the accused's confessional statement was obtained by any of the repressive, pressing, or harsh courts, rightly found guilty after reviewing the evidence. And the accused was well punished for well-grounded reasons. The establishment of judicial principles and any misunderstanding of justice did not result in the payment of ransom to the accused for the release of the abductors, but the Supreme Court has generally done so through lower courts. Did not interfere with the appropriate discretion used. Appeal to the accused can be identified as a reduction in the leave sentence. immigration advocates email from Nankana Sahib lawyer