Find a Lawyer

NASIR ABBAS versus STATE

Clauses 302 (b), 34 and 109 Defining Evidence 2 In two cases, two persons lost their lives, witnesses testified on behalf of a complainant and on behalf of an accused confessed that a relative of the accused. Dar was killed that same day. In the same case which led to the death of the complainant by the complainant, the distance between the two bodies was 15/16 karma, yet two separate FIs were registered and investigated by the complainant. The fact of the death of a person was hidden by the accused from. Until a person was pronounced dead by the accused, he could not be ascertained as neither a copy of the FIR could be found nor the post-mortem report of the victim was taken by the Investigation Officer. Nor did the defendant present it in his defense, failing to bring both parties to the record. The investigating officer of such vital evidence was guilty of conducting a casual investigation without feeling the presence of guilt. As well as the defendant's and the prosecutor's testimony as well as the prosecution's testimony by the defendants, who initiated the fight and how the incident took place, was an important question that was recorded This requires investigation, as the justice's remand for the case will be met. In the absence of justice, the circumstances listed by the trial court were proved aside and the trial was re-sent to the trial court to record the record of the defendant's case filed in the various police station subpoena. Check the coins and the witnesses mentioned in the above calendar. A special period of court observation and decision immigration advocates contact from Hayatabad lawyer