Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ AWAN versus THE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD

RR 2 (b), 7, 10 and 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Residential Allotment Allotment Petitioner As a Government Employee, Asked Question, Flat / Illegal Forced Occupation Authority The action was legally allotted to them by the Joint State Officer on the allotment letter issued by the applicant in favor of the file itself owned by the authority in the cloud as filed by another person against the authority. The case was the plaintiff before the questions were allotted in the civil court premises. The applicant on behalf of the State Department, under the Residential Allotment Rules 2002, may protest against the allotment if it claims ownership of the premises in the dispute, but any related protest, objection or letter from the Authority concerned Was not written to, the authority did not have a department on it. Any notice issued to the applicant who was in legitimate possession of the said premises, seizing the premises in dispute for evacuation of the same Action of Authority, was an extraordinary action which led to numerous allegations made by the Authority. Demonstrated that, without obtaining the approval of the court's authorized jurisdiction, the applicant could not act against the authority and the wrong law was followed. Action that cannot be retained in the hands of the applicant's possession of the flat Forced possession of the flat in dispute in the possession of the applicant was found to be illegal, illegal, without legal authority, illegal and illegal. The High Court has, in effect, given its constitution female advocates from Lalamusa lawyer