Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD RAZA versus STATE

RIR 2 (b) (G) and 43 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468, 471, 482, 483 and 485 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition FIR against the applicant The dismissal of the allegations was that it was not using illegal oil filtration, blending and marketing, but also using fake seals, cans, tapes, stickers and trademarks that contained a monogram of the plaintiff's company petitioner, not just the defendant's company. Was wrongfully hurt, but was also told that no marketing company's agent or dealer, including petitioner respondent, was authorized by the unlawful proceedings, Rolls, 1971 was not covered because it does not fall within the definition of `personof 'as specified in sub-rule (g) of R2 of the above rules. The permission of the Deputy Commissioner or DCO and the authorized authority was required, in the circumstances, to file a case before the raiding and against the applicant under the Petroleum Rules, 1971 as it was only in cases of complaints against the authority. ? d Agents or dealers designated by the marketing company for the sale of their product that prior authorization of the competent authority or DCO was required, in the present case, the local police was listed on the complaint of the person who the plaintiff company Was authorized to file such a complaint. A complaint has been filed against the applicant on behalf of the respondent's company and the applicant by selling fake goods using fake stickers, monograms etc. and damaging his reputation. The business of the petroleum rolls, 1971, is not covered, the request is made online advocate from Kakul lawyer