Find a Lawyer

S. M. ISMAIL versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 17 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Lease Capital Development Authority's appeal dismissal has leased this controversial plot to its Staff Welfare Committee, and the committee initially leased the plot for appellant for thirty years. And appellant manufactured petrol pumps and compressed. After the completion of the thirty-year initial period of the natural gas station lease on the plot, authorities instead of renewing the lease, forcibly disposed of the appellant plate taken by the appellant, claiming that the appellant further claimed that without law enforcement. It cannot be removed. Since the Capital Development Authority had renewed the lease in favor of the Committee, the lease should also be renewed in favor of it, in preparation for raising the rent from Rs 1000 / month to Rs 100,000 / month. On the basis of the lease agreement after the allotment of the plot, the Capital Development Authority became Fact Offio during the lease period. The D did not have the authority or the authority to prosecute the appellant without due process of law or the Capital Development Authority. His staff welfare committee action regarding the placement of the appellant from the dispute site was illegal, without a Winnipeg was responsible authority and the appellant. Illegally or not forcibly, the possession should be disposed of by the jurisdiction, as in the appellant's case the appellant had spent a large sum of money on the dispute site for the installation of petrol pumps and compressed natural gas stations and if leased. There was no period. Extended, the family of the appellant will be financially ruined and ruined, the principle of equity, good conscience and fairness. female advocates from Head Marala lawyer