Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE (NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION) THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHER

Expansion of the Finance Division Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the National KR 27 Office Memorandum No. F1 (5) Amp / 2001, Tariff Commission Employees of the Provincial Pension Scheme and the General Provident Fund of the Commission represented the government for extension of such scheme but were rejected, the government's decision was upheld by the service tribunal and the employees' appeals were dismissed. Had raised the issue. Through its mother ministry, along with the Finance Division's Regulation Wing for approval, the federal government did not approve the commission service tribunal's employees to extend such benefits, but to equate the employees of the commission with employees, Halal not found. There is a long series of correspondence between the Commission and the Finance Division as well as the Federal Government's correspondence between the Ministry of Commerce and Finance, but due to the federal government's stated policy, the finance division continued to regret the proposal that such benefits. Were granted to civil servants and not to the employees of the Commission Government employees were entitled to enforce the right to be protected in the sense of such rights. The terms and conditions served to him but the corporate employee could not enforce such a claim to be a different kind of employee and his terms and conditions of such claim were not guaranteed and the pension award and general The Provident Fund could not do so as a proprietor of its rights. Such employees shall be entitled to such salaries, allowances and permits related to their terms and services as applicable to the National Tariff Commission Employees (Service) Rules. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hassan Abdal lawyer