MUHAMMAD NASIR RAHMAN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Maintaining the Articles 199 and 212 Constitution Petition The reality was that the applicants' complaint was that after restoring their service with returning privileges, the bank was not offering them any special allowance because the bank had acknowledged that it had been involved in an initial settlement. Applicants were paid extra in the phase. Due to a specific error, therefore, the dispute allowance was withdrawn, there is a factual dispute between the parties regarding the claims and their limitation by examining the benefits due to the applicants and calculating the amount of the dispute. This dispute needs to be investigated before it is finally found. Its payment could not be taken by the High Court under its constitutional jurisdiction. Applicants should have referred to the service tribunal for redressal of their grievances, even in view of the bar under Article 1212 of the constitutional application. Was not applicable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
