ASIF KHAN versus STATE
Section 302 (b) evidence was defined as self-defense conviction, the case was reduced to two versions, one was presented by the prosecution and the other by the accused in its statement under section 342, CRPC accused also The police conducted a medical examination and according to their findings, there was a lacerated wound in the front line of the abdomen of the accused who exposed the viscera prosecution of Dr. Pete. Nor was the person accused of injuring an injured person and a person before the trial court when the accused was convicted by the police. When he was examined on the same day, it was changed from section 230b (b), PPC to 2 30 ((c)). In PPC condition, the accused was last behind bars. The sentence of years in prison that had already passed was considered sufficient to meet the scope of justice, the accused acted in self-defense, set aside the amount of compensation awarded to the accused by the trial court. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Ghazi lawyer
