Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus STATE

Testimony of Article 2?2 (b) and the rere evidence Both the prosecution's witnesses claimed that they saw the deceased woman dragged by the accused, but that no attempt was made by them to protect her. Dealt with the prosecution's testimony to the complainant or any other fellow villager. The most unnatural and incredible doctor, who performed a post-mortem examination, never saw the victim's injuries dragged on, nor did the investigating officer find the prosecution's case at the prosecutor's place that the victim was a female. The body was found. The victim's father's home was lied to, but there was no direct evidence to establish the house where the body was found, the suspect's father owned or owned it, the investigating officer said. That this place was surrounded by inhabited houses. And it was located in the village square, in which case it was unbelievable that the cheating would not be reported to the other accused by the accused without notice or any attention, being a co-accused on the day of the marriage ceremony. It cannot be believed that the said participant could commit such on the day of his marriage ceremony, saying that the prosecution case and the accused were sufficient to doubt the credibility of the perpetrators. The conviction and sentence were set aside and they were acquitted of the charge and released. when you need a advocate from Guddu lawyer