Find a Lawyer

NADEEM SARWAR versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, FAISALABAD

R12 Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001), Article 2 (xli) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Nomination for the seat of the worker, papers filed by the Returning Officer for the worker rejected The petitioner filed an appeal against the fact that he had not presented any evidence of being a worker, against which the District Returning Officer relied on the applicant's employer's certificate of proportional orders of the election officials. And other documents that were challenged. It was shown that he was a worker in the meaning of section 2 (xli) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001. Validity Petitioner fulfilled the conditions for submitting nomination papers for the seat of Worf under R12 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005. They did. The applicant had prepared his employer's certificate and proved that he was on the job. The establishment of a series of physical labor by the election officials was a summary of such nature. Therefore, it is not permissible to know whether a detailed investigation is permissible. Whether the person has the status of a worker or not. R12, based on material submitted by Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005 or submitted by an objectioner to challenge the nomination papers, left no option for the election officials to reject the applicant's nomination. Was. Returning Officer accepted with instructions to add applicant's name to the list of candidates for the working set best law firms from Barkhan lawyer