Find a Lawyer

SULTAN AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-I, KARACHI SOUTH

Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Failure to identify the tenant Bona as the nature of the business of the landlord's personal need, the rent controller rejected the removal request on the ground that the landlord knew about his business. I failed to disclose. They had a shop available for them that could be used to order a rent controller. The ploy raised by the lower appellate court landlords was to select their preferred cover if the property owners had more than one home / shop. The choice about the area, house / shop they liked was in their discretion and discretion; the tenant or the leaseholder did not have the option to personally rent the premises of the premises. Resident in question / question. The building shop will be in accordance with the best of the landlords, it should be left at the discretion of the landlords. It was not unreasonable if the landlord was insisting that a particular part of the building be provided to them. There was no requirement that landlords have to disclose the nature of a business to evict a tenant from a shop on the basis of personal and unfunded needs, both of which they intended to start in the premises. The courts had erred in concluding that the questions under the constitutional jurisdiction of the landlord were referred to the High Court. Premises had failed to prove clearly rejected the need for concurrent orders approved by both courts. Order of eviction below and against tenants criminal advocate from Chaghi lawyer