Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus F.D.A. AND ANOTHER

Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Mandatory Retirement Institute of Salary Applicant, who was retired from service, was reinstated by the Service Tribunal, but the decision of the Authority Service Tribunal was implemented. Failed to do Not allowed to join the service under the terms of the service tribunal's decision, filed an application and then reminded the authority to enforce the service tribunal order, but on filing the constitutional petition, when the notice was issued to the authorities , The applicant has been reinstated. After almost a year of restoration order approved by the service tribunal petitioner, authorities have claimed that they had applied today to implement the service tribunal's decision, which led to their employment after restoration. Joined, but the authorities denied the applicant's claim. Accuracy The interim result was o f the negligence of the administration on the basis of which the applicant could not be included in the applicant, in the circumstances of the decision of the service tribunal in view of the principle laid down that he was entitled to the salary of the said period. That the applicant has the right to secure salaries. As a decision of the service tribunal when the applicant did not perform the duties for the said period due to negligence and inactivity of the authority, the constitutional request was accepted to the extent that the authorities were instructed to go through the requests. Applying for a decision to apply for a release of salaries from the date of filing the application. Service Tribunal tax advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer