MUHAMMAD ALI HUSSAIN versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER
Article 199 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6) Interference in the review petition inquiry Following the investigation into the FIR filed by the Legal Assistant Sub Inspector Police, the accused has been declared an innocent sub-inspector and D-section P. Was. The suspect was also found innocent in the investigation and he also prepared a report of cancellation, against which the District Police Officer, on the request of the complainant, handed over the matter to the Inspector Investigation, through the transfer of the said investigation. The Sessions Judge, acting as Justice of the Constitutional Court for Peace, said that the decision of the Additional Advocate General was also dismissed after the first inquiry of A-section I was also investigated by other officials. Asked to confirm and not to investigate the matter, was not correct, because if so Then, the official replacement or do not provide the information or closing. The scope of the certification was limited but verification of the record is valid, but under the guise of the certification, the verification officer could not re-examine it and discuss alternatives. After his first inquiry through his own opinion, Section I, all proceedings were concluded with no legal authority and no legal effect, under the direction of the Section HO and the Inquiry. The officer should be directed to submit a final report. The conclusion of the first inquiry by the aforesaid Section I, however, if a party wishes to re-investigate, may refer to the relevant authorities as considered under the Police Order, Article 18 (6), 2002 thereof. Accordingly requested review
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
