Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAMIN KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, ISLAMABAD

Arts 2, 2A, 14 and 1991 Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Respect for the dignity of man, the High Court sought to interfere with the supply of the disabled person so that he could be allotted a vending stall at the railway station, The personnel was confessed. There was no disability quota for allotment of vending stalls. Due to the various provisions contained in the constitution, the High Court may use its discretion to provide the applicant with a source of honorable living and the dishonor and dishonor of begging. Can prevent Failing to formulate a policy for people with disabilities, the High Court, which was tasked with enforcing the principles contained in the constitution and protecting the rights of citizens in accordance with social justice, such as the Quran and Sunnah I was listed. Because of the inability of the petitioner to exercise constitutional jurisdiction and thus to issue a proper writ, if he were asked to compete with other affluent persons, he would be honorably discharged his right to earn a living. Disobedient and must be compelled to plead because such a violation would be in accordance with the provisions of Articles 14 and 2A of the High Court directing the authorities to issue an allotment order in favor of the applicant at the railway station. / Issue License The High Court recommends authorities to take policy decisions and provide quotas for people with disabilities. That in all such individuals were allowed to apply the method which can make a decent living from \ r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Astore lawyer