Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), NAWABSHAH

Sections 3, 4, 11 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Denying the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, removing the absence of tribunal notice by the authorities In the civil suit issued for the plaintiff was charged with infringement, the trial court observed the case O Section VII, R 11, in view of the bars contained in section 11 of the Sindh Public Property (Elimination of Expulsions) Act, 1975 Plaintiff's dismissal under CPC, the order passed by the trial court, was upheld by the appellant. The court's position on the plaintiff was that there was no tribunal at the time of filing the case as provided for in section 11 of the Sindh Public Property Act 1975, therefore, the notice for termination of the encroachment Was suspended before civil court ratification. Even if the plaintiff's view was that no tribunal was constituted at the relevant time, it would not grant jurisdiction to the civil court, which was banned under Section 11 of the Sindh Public Prospect. The erty (abolition of encumbrances) Act, 1975 If no forum was available to a bereaved person and the jurisdiction of the civil court was banned under the law, then the civil court's jurisdiction in the absence of the forum. Giving will not have effect. Such circumstances may be referred to the High Court for jurisdiction, in which it was expressly provided that if no remedy was available to an individual, such person could approach the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Under which the jurisdiction of the civil courts at the end of both courts power of attorney advocate Sohawa District Daska lawyer