Find a Lawyer

MOHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Section O 13 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Retention Complaint Petition Others with the applicant were initially appointed as General Workers in Department Production at the Employer Company. Was transferred, but was later transferred to another department. The company and its services were certified as a general worker, after which, after 5 years of applicant service, its services were terminated on the basis that the company was retained. Did not want the applicant transferred and upon filing a complaint against the applicant against the employee's dismissal / retrial order, the Labor Court set aside the termination and returned the applicant. Restored all incentives, but the Labor Appellate Tribunal set aside the Labor Court's decision. Ordinary worker Where he was initially appointed he was, in fact, working in a department at the time he was later transferred, unnecessary, and could not be classified in a separate category upon transfer. The seniority would be counted among the ordinary workers and not in the department where he was transferred. Another department of the company, the applicant, was not junior and could not be reinstated as a junior with others and could not be reinstated while the dismissal of prosecution by other ordinary workers was retained. Not in accordance with the terms of the Standing Order 13. Labor Appellate Tribunal on Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 jobs for fresh advocates from Dudial lawyer