ADIL MAHMOOD versus ATLAS LEASING LIMITED
Articles 9, 10, 12 and 22 of the Debt Settlement and the former Rule for Defendant, appearing before the trial court, setting aside the defendant, filed for leave submission and defense. , But after that he was absent, and the proceedings against the former party were dismissed on the basis of leave and the application for defense claim on the basis of illegal prosecution and accordingly the plaintiff sought financial security (security of finance). Under the Ordinance 2001, an application for separation of the ex parte order was filed stating that there was no notice / summons. The defendant alleged that despite knowing the correct address of the plaintiff, he had generally given the wrong address which was why he was never issued a summons and his correct address was his Was served. As stated in the letter and further asserted that the present appeal and affidavit were also presented by the defendant, n the defendant's claim in this address was baseless and he had made false claim. The defendant was merely to delay the execution and pressurize the appeal that the appeal filed by the defendant was dismissed without justification.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer