ASAD SHUJA SIDDIQUI THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL
Article 199 The petitioner's complaint for concealing the facts was that the development authority had refused to exempt him, claiming that the original owner had sold his land and that the waiver authority had already been approved. If the applicant had any claim that was against the original owner and the civil suit, the litigation case was pending to conceal the facts in the civil court case and the civil suit was pending between the private parties. Pending constitutional jurisdiction should be arbitrary. The person seeking equity must. Should come in the form of The High Court had no jurisdiction to resolve disputed questions in the jurisdiction of the Constitution. The applicant had an alternative way of filing a civil suit before a competent court for the resolution of the disputed questions. Refused to be arbitrary. Petitoo n dismissed accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.