MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE
Sections 302 (c), 305, 309, 310, 396 and 455 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 4545 Azad Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VII of 1974), Section murder42 to acquit It has the right to compile. Trader Willi, Section 9 or Section 101010, was pledged to pardon or cover the crime of murder under PPC, the heirs / guardian of the deceased Qalat Emad, the heirs of the deceased under section 454545 In the present case of the PC, Wali was the victim, the affected parent, who challenged the trial court's decision before the Shariat Court government / state, the merger can only take place if there is no party in the present heir deceased. Was the guardian of the case, not the state which implemented the case, counsel for the accused / appellants argued that the sentence passed against the accused was not a crime. I had not had azir tzyr, when the State was not party tzyr the victim's family, so it was back. Reason; Emad was responsible for the matter, regardless of whether the convict was convicted or not. It was the nature of the case, not the sentence, which was the essence was In the case of murder, the province was imposed by the law on the deceased's heirs, whatever punishment was passed by the court or the state government. It didn't matter. In cases where the heirs of the deceased or deceased have been given the right to compound or exempt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Warah lawyer