Find a Lawyer

SYED AMJAD ALI versus CH. AMIR AFZAL (RETD.) CHIEF ENGINEER

The respondents' initial objection to the Section 42 Supreme Court retention lawyer and client's professional conduct was that of a writ petition filed by similar facts, the law and any other person thereafter. Died, was dismissed by the High Court and a fresh petition was filed by the same applicant on the same petitioner's request to reproduce the act data. The allegations were raised by a former lawyer of both the default and closing litigation. Ryah were conducted and stamps were so. Purchased in the name of the current lawyer, which shows that in the second round of litigation the lawyer acted on behalf of the deceased, the Advocate asked the former appellant to know the facts and fate of the previous case. I was willing to file a petition or appeal. And, after finally settling the matter, the ND's foundation, through the current appellant ethos of the profession, tried to approach the court again on the same facts, demanding that once the matter was finally settled by the Supreme Court in any case. If it was represented by the same lawyer, the same case could not be prosecuted by any other party again. Advocate parties may not know the legal status of the matter, but lawyers, who were officers of the court and as good as the judges themselves, are expected to behave the same way for the consent of the courts and Expect them. Judges demanded to be advocated, even us immigration advocates from Daska lawyer