Find a Lawyer

MST. SAKINA BIBI versus DILAWAR KHAN

Section 12 (2) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181, nine years after the approval of the disputed judgment and decree, and the verification of the verdict and the disputed variable, the reversal of the judgment and decree on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation. The petition, filed under section 12 (2), filed under section 12 (2) seeking the reversal of the judgment and decree based on the fraudulent and misrepresentation of the applicants, the CPC, Demarcation Act 1908 The ban was badly banned as a limitation period provided under Article 181, no plausible explanation was offered for the delay in years, The application was rightly rejected as a time restriction, unless otherwise the applicant failed to indicate any wrongdoing or non-reading by the appellate court below and could not prove that the defendant Ali obtained the decree through fraud. And misrepresentation In the absence of any jurisdictional error or illegal or material misconduct in the appellate court's decision, the finding of i ts cannot be interfered with. \ R \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n solicitors from Lasbela lawyer