Find a Lawyer

STATE versus DOST MUHAMMAD

My appeal against the section 417 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324, is the fact that the witnesses in this case had a close relationship and had a slight bitterness with the accused because of a women-related dispute, It was not enough to refuse to analyze and examine the testimony of their evidence, if any significant material in the record was confirmed, the FIR could have been relied upon when all relevant details of the incident, including the name of the accused. The lawsuit was filed with reasonable promptness. All the witnesses of the prosecution successfully passed the cross examination, their evidence found no material contradiction or contradiction, which agrees with all the material facts of the case which showed that the witness was true and true. In this case, the alleged contradictions were not material. Neither a conclusion nor a basis for securitization can be found. There was no hostility between the accused and the witnesses, nor was there any hostility proposed between them, no evidence from the prosecution's witnesses Neither motive nor cause was identified which was falsely accused, the evidence of the witnesses was convincing and there is no reason to conclude their evidence. It is said that the trial court's finding on the vacancy by the complaining party was purely um and did not support the law. Medical evidence was in complete harmony with the Acol account and no contradiction could be identified. The evidence of the complainant and the prosecution testified against the accused against the accused top advocates from Poonch lawyer