Find a Lawyer

RANA ABDUL GHAFFAR versus ABDUL SHAKOOR

Sections 6, 12, 38, 28 and the Third Schedule [as amended by the Anti-Terrorism (Second Amendment) Act, 2004 (II of 2005)], the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 365A of Section 34 Read with the Constitution (1973), Arts 199 and 12 constitutional petition for ransom terror transfer or kidnapping for ransom terror transfer case jurisdiction sentence procedure, in the present case the Additional Sessions Judge was hearing and mentioned The trial was enacted by the Anti-Terrorism (Second Amendment) Act, 2004. The crime of abduction or ransom was included in the third schedule included in the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Such offense was specifically heard by the Anti-Terrorism Court, constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Was declared. Under Section 12 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the court requests the jurisdiction of this court so that the record of this case is sought from the court of the Additional Sessions Judge. The case can be prosecuted by the Anti-Terrorism Court, however, after the introduction of the Anti-Terrorism Court (Second Amendment) Act, 2004, the judge was dismissed by an anti-terrorism court-certified judge. Anti-Terrorism Court Because now only such court, which was constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, was specifically empowered to hear the same case and if any, any accused Can be prosecuted by the judge, anti-terrorism court; cannot be greater than or may not be distinguished by the relevant law from any sentence related to the crime when the said crime was committed. The law attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rashidabad lawyer