Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus STATE

Article 231 and 537 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 337 F (ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) argued that Section 337 F (ii) of the trial case under trial. By adding, on the day of the declaration of judgment, the PPC did not provide the accused with the opportunity to re-seek or retrieve and re-examine the witnesses required under section 231, CRPC prosecuted under section 23I. The hearing failed, CRPC provided that whenever an allegation was altered or incorporated by it. After the commencement of the trial, the prosecutor and the accused will be allowed to re-seek and re-examine and examine any such changes or additions, any witnesses who may be examined, The price is 5 1 231, the PC indicated that a request was made before this request was made or usually allowed by an application or request since no such request or request was made. So, it was not necessary for the court to examine or re-memorize or resume. In addition, re-seeking or re-seeking witnesses or examining witnesses shall be in respect of such changes or additions. The allegations were not altered by the court as it was earlier alleged that the complainant was tried for life by firing. The same charge was made, effectively and subsequently in the amended charge, that is, the complainant's attempt to live his life has been effectively abused and he has suffered more. lawer from fb area from Shakargarh lawyer