Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR KHAN versus STATE

Sections 324 and 353 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 164 definition of evidence, controversial statements of prosecution witnesses and positive report of firearm expert, linking the accused to the commission. Were enough for them. Criminal defense could not prove why the police would falsely accuse the accused, especially since none of the police party had any credibility against him, the prosecution witness, who was a police officer, made statements on material points. And the accused failed to disclose any of our contradictions. The statements made by the accused's lawyer were so minor that, on the basis of which, it could not be said that the accused was being prosecuted and voluntarily supported the confession of the accused before the prosecuting magistrate. Testified and testified as a witness It was voluntarily admitted, no doubt, that it was recorded 6 days after the arrest of the accused, but the delayed confessional statement itself does not need to be deemed offensive if it is in accordance with the law. When the record was recorded, no material was available that would indicate that the accused was forced to make a confessional statement or that the facts of the criminal confession were found to be serious, in the material case, by the accused. The confessional statement given the details of the incident was a hard time to prove that the confession was true and the voluntary prosecutor R was proved beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused and the impressive permanent and reliable evidence was extracted with loads successfully, Egypt prosecution witnesses online advocate from Khuiratta lawyer