MAJEED AHMAD versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, RAJANPUR
R14 (3) (1) and (4) Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance (V of 2000), Sections 2 (10) and 6 (2) (B) Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), 5 54 Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the election of reserved seats for farmers in the District Council, the first and other candidates challenging each other on each other having more than 5 acres of land approved by the Returning Officer. Withdraw appeals from the District Returning Office. The Returning Officer did not have to reveal to the third candidate the constitutional request of the third candidate challenging the approval of the nomination papers for such candidates by the two candidates before the eleven marla land mentioned in Jambandi. It did not exist and cannot be confirmed. Rule 14 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005 had the power to automatically transfer / sell during the five years before the election year, equivalent to confirming that the first candidate was eligible or In the event of such a clash, mechanical and normally ineligible persons would not be allowed to contest the special seat of the peasantry. The first candidate was charged with selling legal data as fraud and would not affect a person's legal transfer of property, nor would he prosecute a farmer. Because five years did not end with the election year. With the appeal against the other candidate, he showed his ownership of 87 kanals, 4 marla land if the District Returning Officer has started the municipality.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
