RAJA NAJABAT ALI versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD
The controversial question of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional ballot counting and tampering with ballot papers was that after the final results were announced, votes were directed at the direction of the District Returning Officer. The re-counting, and the respondents being declared as retired candidates, was picked up by the applicants that the ballot papers were tampered with after the result was consolidated and the Returning Officer authorized to count the votes. Was not given because it became a factual dispute in relation to the rigging of polling stations or the questioning of fact in the ballot papers, which required detailed examination and recording of evidence, which declared the final result. Afterwards, the constitutional jurisdiction of the Returning Officer / District Returning Officer in practice Could not be executed by the Vert, after the authorized authority became Factudio, therefore, they could not reopen the matter and any inquiry in this regard could be resolved only by the Election Tribunal constituted by the Chief Election Commissioner. Is constitutional application dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
