Find a Lawyer

ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN

Section O 15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI or 2002), Sections 46 and 47 (3) postponed the development for three years with a change in the sentence for dismissal of employment due to corruption, which included cash Was under direct supervision of the defendant, who was found guilty in the investigation against him, who served as cashier in the appellant bank respondent, but was dismissed before the Labor Court. On appeal by the plaintiff against the dismissal order, the sentence of dismissal will allow the employer to extend his employment for three years. The deferral was changed and the respondent was instructed to reinstate. Outraged by this order, the appellant bank filed an appeal before the High Court respondent, who never reported the cash shortage to his superiors, acknowledged his guilt and defendants. , On no occasion raised any objection or claimed that the confession had taken the offense under any undue influence or hardship or repression, in which the defendant tried to deceive his superiors. However, it did not have the slightest issues that were affected by its goals and mismanagement. Then he tried to cover up the matter by deceiving his superiors. The respondent was not only guilty of theft, but was found guilty but it is true that the amount of money that the bank was charged by the respondents will not be exempt from the mismanagement made by the employer-bank only. The nature of the banking business and the maintenance of financial discipline best advocate from Rangoo lawyer