MST. SAMINA THROUGH ATTORNEY versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI THROUGH DISTRICT COORDINATE OFFICER, KARACHI
Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Lease / Allotment, Cancellation of Applicants, Acting in the Interest of the Original Lease / Allotment, in the Order of its Constitutional Request Approved by the District Officer (Revenue), whereby the Village Form VII I dismissed the entries in their favor because such entries were wrong as a result of the original lease / allotment of interest in the interest of their former Deputy Commissioner Petitioners at the time claiming that their application However, various jurisdictions were transferred in their favor by the then jurisdiction. The Mukhtarkar said that the rights record changed in his favor, but the entries in his favor were canceled by the District Officer (Revenue) on the basis that the original lease / allotment from which the applicant was of interest to them. Claimed they are no longer tenants. The ground examination of the said records shows that the entries were kept by the then Mukhtarika, which completely violated the law of the tax and said that the entries were kept without looking at the same entries available in the record. Under the orders of the then Deputy Commissioner, the leases had already been canceled in favor of the predecessors in the interest of the applicants. A note was made against the original entries by the concerned officer, but despite noting seven entries at seven different points, Mukhtarkar had placed new entries in favor of Mukhtarkar's explanation, stating that seven entries had I mentioned the cancellation, did not appear that day, entries were placed in favor of the applicants, it was not acceptable. The department directed anti-corruption.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
