Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AKBAR versus DISTRICT GOVERNMENT RAJANPUR DISTRICT

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petitions Against 23 Vacant Assessments Department of Promotion Committee promoted 23 patwari along with 23 patwari after completion of 2 year trial period. Recommended appointment of applicants under the legal appointment. Against the recommendations of the committee, the tribunal implemented the affected applicants as applicants as applicants. With the unanimous consent of the parties, the Tribunal remanded the Committee, which in accordance with the amending rules, terminated the condition of passing the Lawgus examination and included the names of the Committee. The applicant's objection was that they did not cover the words used in the remand order, so their case could not be reopened by the committee as their promotion order was finalized and they were appropriate. There were no patwari at the time. The applicant, if aggrieved by the remand order, either seek his explanation from the tribunal or he will be bound by the remand order once he has filed the appeal before the Supreme Court, therefore, through constitutional petition. Indirectly prevented from raising such an objection, the remand order had reached the applicants deadline. Failure to challenge the applicant before the Supreme Court upon remand, may challenge the order of the Committee, which has been approved, before the competent authority and the Tribunal, to object to the terms and conditions of service to Germany. Special hearing was called for the execution of the remand order in the judgment before the tribunal. tax advocates from Murree lawyer