Find a Lawyer

MUJEEBUR REHMAN QAZI versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN

Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A & 37 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 48 Service dismissal complaint appeal was presented to the employee with notice on some of the allegations The employee denied the allegations And the response was submitted and inquiries were made against the employees and, when approaching the investigation, it was advisable to take a gentle attitude towards the employee, but without personally listening to him or giving any final show cause notice. The employee proved to be an employee, although he was promoted to a Grade II officer, but was not an independent officer, but had his own subordinates and responsibilities about which to meet. As a landlord, the employer bank was second in the employee's relevant branch; the Labor Court could maintain a complaint to the Labor Court before the Labor Court could not justify dismissing the employee's complaint request that it work. Not all investigating officers had forgiven the employee of the charges / allegations A dismissal letter was issued instead of the employee, although the inquiry officer had made the same suggestion that this was not the only action that proved it. Was that the employer was adamant on removing the employee from the job, but other employer's actions were also hostile to the employee. Proved that the complaint filed by the employee was in the complaint petition was submitted with explanation after 131 days of information about the employee's alleged misconduct, which was expressly forbidden from time to time against the employee. Inquiries were made, when two years later, before dismissing his complaint request, no proper inquiry was made against the employee, while the employees were not proven guilty. In list of advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer