STATE versus MUHAMMAD HAROON
There is no evidence in the appeal record against section 156 (1) (89) being bad to show that the silver recovered from the accused was either smuggled or reasonably smuggled - It is suspected that silver is being reported. Without such a set of information to be smuggled in with the imported silver, being smuggled was not enough to create any reasonable suspicions about it, especially when the information mentioned was no silver Did not disclose details or when and by whom the country was struggling to seize any quantity of gold or silver in any form or in any form, there was no crime under any law in the country. The burden failed to show that the recovered silver was either smuggled. Or suspected to be reasonably smuggled. The very strong evidence justifying the interference of the decisions made by the appellate court was shown by the supporters after the eviction, when the double notion of innocence was created in favor of the accused, Due to the shortage of the case, the appeal against the defendant's verdict was dismissed in the circumstances. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Sohawa District Daska lawyer