Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN PAC BOARD, KAMRA versus AZHAR HUSSAIN

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Advance increment, after the retirement of the Pak Air Force after the grant of the Principal Government Employee, the Government employees refused the advance of the two employees and allowed the appeal of the Government employee. ? Instructed authorities that a public servant was eligible to continue the advance increments after re-employment. Whether the duplicate benefit of advance increments is doubled, that is, the former service and the subsequent service. Regardless of the salary paid to the civil servant and the integration of two advance increments given to the pension, it enables him to receive two advance increments again from his subsequent employment. Regardless of the instructions in the Finance Division OM No F, as per the Establishment Division OM 10/52/95 / R 2, dated 18 7 1996, Finance Division (Reg Wing) OM No. F 5 (4) R 3/96, 16 16 1996 4 (7) Reg 4/72, Date 1 1 1973, OM No. F4 (11) Reg 7/72, Dated 11 1 1973 and OM No. F6 (6 R3) 84/615, Date 1 8 1984 , Should, the Service Tribunal consider the decision of the dispute. Whether public servants, in accordance with their appointment letter, adhere to the Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964, Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973 and other government orders / instructions. Can the principle of lukewarmness be put to service in view of this rule in various Supreme Court decisions? And what will be the effect of the date of 1973, Finance Division OM No. 4 (7) Reg 4/92? top advocate from Daharki lawyer