Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus ELAHI BAKHSH

Section 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation, admission of written statement Keeping it separate. On the first date the defendant was scheduled to appear, the Effect Suit was ordered for the specific performance of the sale agreement, which was approved on the written statement of the date. The plaintiff filed an application under section 12 (2), the basis of the fraud and misrepresentation, although the defendant acknowledged his signature on the written statement but refused to consult the lawyer who had written the statement. The defendant believed that the lawyer who filed the written statement was his lawyer in another case. And he had a deep connection with the plaintiff, who obtained his signature on blank paper for use in the second case but falsely misused his signature in the trial case as well as the appellate court. Was excluded, but in the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court, rejecting the decree submitted by the plaintiff, said that under the jurisdiction of the Constitution, the conclusions of the following two courts could not be excluded. The defendant's admission that his signature was in his hand on the written statement would not be sufficient to draw any negative clue as to the defendant's explanation, as it was usual for the lawyers in the courts to remain vacant. Papers containing the signature of their clients that briefly describe their specific use with their client's signatures, so the mere fact that the defendant's signature Pakistan, top advocate family court from Swabi lawyer