RANA MUHAMMAD GULZAR versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD THROUGH SECRETARY
The re-counting of the votes of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner and deputy Nazim, the results prepared by the Returning Officer revealed that the applicants cast 2821 votes and the respondents cast 2762, constitutional The High Court, which passed the petition, ruled that the returning officer was being examined by the High Court, while examining the rejected votes in the case, while the returning officer was being examined by the Election Commission of Pakistan's section officer. Signature received a fax message that re-counted all votes for seats You are being instructed, the order of re-counting has been withdrawn from the orders of the Chief Election Commissioner through the notice of the Moderator and the Deputy, and the provocative parties have been directed to refer to the competent Election Tribunal for any reason or The basis was not disclosed because the re-counting has been ordered, but the party cannot explain why the re-order was ordered. The re-counting orders were passed. Rejected and rejected 133 votes cast in favor of applicants, if provoked So, the Chief Election Commissioner can file an election before a competent Election Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
