Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus PERVAIZ MEHANDI

Sections 3, 3A, 24 and 43 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44, in the present case regarded the theoretical powers of the High Court as a vacant property which was considered vacant property and The migrants were allotted, which could be termed as evacuation, as was done in this case, in the presence of the provisions of Section 3A and 24, after the declaration of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Administration of Evacuation Property Act 1957. Was. And other Act decisions on any of these sections revolve around the declaration of the role of the property in any case, whether evacuation or eviction or it falls directly under the jurisdiction of Section 43A of the Jammu and Kashmir Administration. Will The revision powers of the High Court under section 43A of the Azami Property Act, 1957 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1957 were, in fact, a continuation of the proceedings. Under the aforesaid clause, the holder of the AQUE Property High Court was allegedly executed and had the same authority over the editorial capacity as the AQUE Property PASBAN, which means he can check, record, call witness and record etc. Can check. The case of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Administration of IQE Property Act 1957 was independent and complete and broad in this regard under section 44 of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974. law firms from Patoki lawyer