Find a Lawyer

ZIAUL KARIM versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

Article 199 Constitutional petitioner claimed that he had obtained a plot in question from a construction company and had considered the sale, but after that he found that the construction company had no title to be called a plot. And it is the official land. The question is whether the construction company was not owned by the company. Such activity continued for many years under the nose of civil servants but they did not take any notice of it and the company did not want to deceive the applicants. Was allowed, when considering the company he was paying, had not entered into any inquiries about the title of the company involved in the disputed property, and this is one of the many cases where people like applicants Was betrayed and tricked by builders and construction companies, and government officials never No action was taken on. At the right time to protect the innocent citizen, the petition was rejected by the Constitutional Applicants with the observation that the applicants were in an independent court to approach the competent court / forum / authority to resolve their complaint as required by law. Is. law firms from Rawat lawyer