Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ BAJWA versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, the grant of further investigative co-accused, which was declared to be the same role in which the accused was burdened. Weighing permission from the court was due to the co-accused saying that the co-accused had made an exception to the complaint, while he strongly opposed giving bail to the accused, the fact that the accused and the co-accused were the same. The character was cut off, and that was enough for the complainant to later drop out. The complainant's credibility could not be allowed to cast doubt on the fact that initially anyone could be authorized to include someone in a section 497 (1), CRC prohibited clause, and Subsequently, accusing him of expelling him, in such a case, was a bad indication of the complainant's behavior and his reputation in such a case, and it is likely that the accused was falsely implicated. And he couldn't get away with it. It cannot be excluded, which made the accused a further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2), the PC suspect was admitted on bail under the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer