SHER KHAN versus UNITED BANK LTD.
Article 2 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The applicant was of the view that the service tribunal, in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court, continued its jurisdiction in connection with the bank's privatization process. Will Employees and respondents, on the other hand, cited another Supreme Court decision that said the service tribunal would not have jurisdiction to decide the cases of employees whose cases are subject to Section 2A, Service Tribunals, Act 1973. Will come The leave of appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to examine the relevant contentions of the parties which raised the question of the importance of publicity in relation to the authenticity of Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer
