Find a Lawyer

RANA ABDUL QADIR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, DEFENCE PRODUCTION DIVISION, THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE,

R14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Acquired Land, for which all supply had already been completed and award announcement and compensation was not used for the purpose for which The petitioner was acquitted (the son of the deceased landlord) seeking the direction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution and the transfer of the undivided land to him, thereby, becoming the legal heir of the original owner of the land acquired. Reason, for which he (the applicant) was willing to pay, withdrew from receiving the money received by his father late at the time of the award. In the case of Ari, it was important to keep this in mind and where the acquisition was complete in all respects, but the former landlords demanded Regulation 14, Punjab Land for the return of the land. The acquisition rules, 1983 made it clear that the land and its purpose. Upon abandonment, it was to be handed over to the collector who was responsible at the time of the government's orders as to the absolute nature of the settlement, so the petition could be issued by the High Court to the authorities. They should return the land to the applicants and open a suitable course for them, under R14, the Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983 were registered with the Government. The Constitution was dismissed so that their request could be considered immigration advocates email from Sambrial lawyer