Find a Lawyer

FAIZ-UR-REHMAN versus HAJI ABDUL WAHEED

Proof of co-ordination of students for discrimination, pre-emperor's son's testimony in relation to the discrimination, pre-emption of the plaintiff on the admission of evidence of the plaintiff / family son in favor of his father What was the object The child molester argument was presented by the plaintiff because the inquiry was made by a former importer about the information conveyed by his son. The defendant's view was that since the interest of the son and father was in the same property which should be vacated. According to the hadith, the father published student-made publications where the son was a minor witness or had a son in the pre-arrest case filed by his father in the presence of his son or father. The merger would be violated and there was a difference between the evidence in relation to the evidence of the fact of the dispute and the evidence of the son's evidence in favor of his father and grandfather. Or the wife was not accepted in favor of her husband, etc., as per the instruction, all of them were declared to be interesting witnesses, but the evidence in the presence of any fact, therefore, would not fall into this prohibited domain. The incident may or may not lead to the establishment of a right. If the testimony of the son is omitted in connection with an incident or fact, then hundreds of cases will never be dismissed before aid, which is never before Islamic law. Could have been. He had a separate personality from his father and he was entitled to his free property if the son received the information about the sale of a particular land to his father, and the father had given his son advocate from Dadakhel lawyer