Find a Lawyer

DR. ABDUL JALIL versus STATE

In the present case, the accused was pressured by the strictness of the section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 strictly forbidden, denied bail, according to which he has been imprisoned since 1997 without any fault. Was behind bars. The trial court's report clearly found that the defendant himself was not serious about closing the case as he moved petitions to adjourn the case on several dates and his lawyer was certainly absent on such dates. But a speedy and fair trial was the basic right of an accused and the delay in the trial was never granted. The purpose of the criminal trial was to have the accused face trial and criminal charges against him. But if in any case, the accused himself would be late in the case. If he is found to be involved, he cannot be blamed either himself or anyone else on such charges, in which case, he could not be allowed to get the premium for his mistake and for this simple reason he The mistake is made. Delaying his own trial, Rosen could not stop himself from crying for being a hard-boiled vessel, accusing himself of not being serious about concluding the trial, which was guaranteed by him. Would not be entitled to a concession because of the alleged difficulty was not presented. The accused, he was not entitled to bail was granted a bail application, in the circumstances advocate for immigration from Wan Radha Ram lawyer