MST. JAMILA BIBI versus STATE
Sections 497 (5) of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 6 and 10, the cancellation of the bail, mainly on the basis of the delay in filing the FIR under the juvenile provisions and the minor age of the accused. The delay in filing the Justice System Ordinance, 2000 FIR was defined, even in such cases the delay in filing the FIR was generally ignored, indicating that the incident. At the time of the incident, the accused had an X-ray report over 16 years, which was more accurate than physical medical examination and school records, indicating that the accused was 18 years of age at the time of his presence. S was higher, but not in such circumstances, section 497, shall be governed by the CR pruuysu PC sbuxn (1). Nor does the definition of "child of" as provided in section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, that the trial against the accused was initiated, without any power, considering the facts and the circumstances of the case. False accusations were made. The bail was granted, he was canceled and the accused was taken into custody and sent to jail. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Mithi lawyer