Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SADIQ versus STATE

Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 bail, the defendant's grant was in judicial closure because his arrest and final trial were not in sight if convicted under two different provisions of the offense. On the other hand, the less punitive law had to be pressed into service even if Article 3 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 was invoked in this case, only after the registration of evidence can it be determined that the prima fee The accused's case was covered under Article 4. Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979 because it was found to be in possession of only 51 grams of heroin, which did not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, CRPC, if any, at the bailout stage Will go Prima fax, case for bail, after being released, the accused admitted to bail \ r \ n \ r \ n divorce advocates from Ali Chak lawyer