MANSOOR AKBAR versus STATE
Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 420, 468, 471, 477 A & 34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Pre-arrest Guarantee, denial of two co-accused Was not entitled The pre-arrest bail should be offered because they have been allegedly convicted of the crime, although Section 497 (1) did not fall within the CRPC prohibition clause, but their case was dismissed as extraordinary. Was denied. In matters of bail, the courts, in their private capacity, had to look at the seriousness of a crime committed by an individual who was of a different class and was empowered to fall into the abnormal state of nature. The maximum penalty for being involved in this crime can be guaranteed to be less than ten years, unless in the absence of exceptional circumstances, under the prohibited clause of Section 497, CR PC In subsequent cases, bail exercises could be allowed and the court also had material available to demonstrate strictness in the exercise of the discretion of bailing offenders, saying that the co-accused was an involved offense and the participant in the plea Bail was released on bail prior to the arrest of the accused,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Khanpur lawyer