MUHAMMAD ARIF versus HAJI SATTAR THROUGH HIS L.RS.
Sections 15 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application for dismissal, were held by the appellate authority, setting aside the ex parte withdrawal orders, the ex parte order passed by the Rent Controller, The applicant / tenant had filed a constitutional petition against this order. The landlord, who sought to evict the applicant from the shop under question, had disclosed two addresses of the applicant; And secondly the business premises, but no attempt by the landlord to serve the grocery store Which was the case in Iraq was demanding. Due to this, Landlord was unable to provide satisfactory answer to the High Court's question as to why the notice was not presented or tried at the grocery store, on the alleged refusal, the petitioner served on the second case. In which the courts presented the case to the following courts: Not exercising jurisdiction over them, which is properly the rental control order and the appeal authority's decision, was set aside and the rent controller was instructed to comply with the law within the term. Decide the Removal Request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
