ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (3) and 16 Guarantees, delay of 12 days in filing FIR was not assured by complainant Was allowed / accused of buying some articles and going to market with the accused. It is alleged that she had previously married the drainage before the case was registered. The auctioneer had earlier filed a private complaint under Sections 452 and 506, and his statement was filed. The type of magistrate in whom he confessed to his marriage with the accused was charged and no charge of forcible adultery was laid against the accused when the complaining party before the sessions judge gave him a 495, c. In the petition submitted by the accused under RPC, the session was brought before the judge. Subsequently, a statement made by the police under the alleged advertisement under Section 161, CCPC was filed against the accused. First, the case of the accused was brought under further scrutiny. , It was acknowledged
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer
