Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR ALIAS KAKA versus STATE

Verifying the value of Section 2 (2 (b) evidence), the FIR was lodged with an appropriate accused and was specifically designated in the FIR as the only perpetrators of the crime were well acquainted with each other. They knew that because they lived in the village at night, not only was the moonlight night, but also a light bulb proved on the spot that the eyewitnesses of the persons living with their father in the house of the incident were extremely And their availability cannot be doubted at the relevant time or on the spot. Khay will not be present so that the former has not been shown any reason to falsely deceive the latter in this case - why would the Syrian witness replace the suspect with the original culprit and allow his father's real killer to be skated free? , The ocular testimony was a direct and direct motivation FIR proved that the medical evidence supported the eyewitness account of the incident that none of the events supporting the death sentence of the accused were present on the record. And the conviction was upheld. pakistani advocates Killa Abdullah lawyer