Find a Lawyer

AAMIR KHURSHID MIRZA versus STATE

Section 6 406/4 4020 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 201 Constitutional Petition Deletion of FI Amount Another High Court had already inquired against the accused, who was present in a special court in connection with the crime in the banks. There was a hearing. , The order which was not challenged was finalized, the accused had demanded his victory under CRPC 5 249A, in view of the rule laid down in the said judgment, but his pleas were still Pending trial because the trial court adjourned the hearing. On the basis that the matter is under consideration with the Chairman, the defendant filed the present constitutional petition after failing to obtain a decision before the National Accountability Bureau Trial Court, despite the postponement by the High Court, pending the trial. The source was moved. On the request made by the Chairman National Accountability Bureau, all proceedings made by the Court of Trial C to the required accountability court before proceeding before the High Court order, after which it is baseless and completely There was no jurisdiction, therefore, this case would never be considered as equitable to the transfer of a special court order, because the trial did not require a trial. The court, applying the constitutional mandate of Article 3 of the Constitution, had no choice but to influence the High Court's decision, but instead settled on the matter for the above reason. In another case, the hearing was ordered to stop the proceedings. The field that will be used to take advantage of the aforementioned decision how to become a advocate from Jatoi lawyer